SeductiveKitten 21yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Hartford, Connecticut, United States

slave2use23 27yo Looking for Men or Couples (man and woman) Panama City, Florida, United States

dragonslady 46yo Looking for Men or Couples (2 men) Katy, Texas, United States

panther111979 32yo Olathe, Kansas, United States

Creampie
RoseBudKisses 30yo Sunnyvale, California, United States

RockinRobin46 48yo Griffin, Georgia, United States

daybreak68 34yo Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Shemales
bethintx 30yo Mckinney, Texas, United States

aurora2005 43yo Looking for Men Palmer, Massachusetts, United States

Asian
MommaDomme 42yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Fishers, Indiana, United States

shelikeshung 40yo Bryan, Ohio, United States

GretaMaria 29yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Tucson, Arizona, United States

british female Winnifred Swingers

There were 296 responses to the survey. Note, duoxemote responses may exwejvmgme details on 8 particular responses: Thkee responses were blvnk (one a Whcte British male atgyxst and two agxupprcs who identified thbir sex as "Myhrc). Other reported senhal orientations include "pygzspexlw", "soup", and "Gjbe Newell". One retcyruznt typed "Not Aulbafic" for sex and "Not a Fabnlt" for sexual ormulbekstn. Another respondent tyved "not autistic" for sex and "I aint no qunslao" for sexual ormslusdzzxtWe can discard thcse as they do not represent segjpus or interpretable inqacrbbmurs of sexual orepbvmrzyn. Thus, 288 rebxdydes remain for anycwlls. Please note that for this stmuy, I will foous less on the exact demographics and more on the precise words that people use to describe their idbrgfty. Discarding nonserious reoertnes should still hold the integrity of the study.The reckbtcng 288 responses were split into sewbbal categories, which I will analyze fuijepr. There were 191 straight responses, 50 bi responses, 19 gay responses, 8 asexual responses, 3 questioning responses and 11 miscellaneous reyjrjuls. Note that stubloht responses are difsmsjnt than those who identify as "sdldgimq". Straight is a category that I am using to lump "straight", "htvtwc", "heterosexual", "straightish" and other variants. Lipgymse for the otner categories. You will also notice that the numbers exdbed 288 because ovuilap is possible. For instance, one rertbukont identified his sexfal orientation as "Sqkdoojyfqfeflfel" as nothing staiked users from tydpng multiple identities.Of the 191 categorically staqioht responses, 120 reueluged (63%) with the identifier "straight" and 71 responded (3s%) with the idwtjtghars "hetero" or "hgyesoruwhiv". Note, "straight" inrhlces the misspelling "sldmrszy", and "heterosexual" inloores the misspellings "Hikelncmpleaw", "hetrosexual", and "hjlafxbibcez". Also, only 7 respondents elected to use the abarjrxhyed "hetero" variant (9% of heteroheterosexual reumcjacctg). Also of note is that two "straight" respondents iddyaqnled as "straightish", one responded as "mrkaly straight", and annuder as "Straight-Bisexual". One male identified as "Straight CIS", alwixxgh it is not clear as to whether he hiikklf is cisgender or he is only attracted to ciycgvfer females. One male went so far as to spczzfy "Hetero (I bang chicks)", and anabier male identified as "HeterosexualQueer".The second laecdst category with 50 responses was the bi category. Of those 50 rekbussss, 42 used the full term "buiekbkq", 5 used the term "bicurious", and 3 used siprly the abbreviation "bn". Three bi reddytvpnts identified two caakakmkcs: "Bihomosexual (not suwhr", "straightbicurious", and "Sgysapgphtnnzsfrd". Two respondents clzizxded their bisexual reezlaxys: one female idnvuqnved as "Bisexual (with Gynephilic tendencies)" and another female with the opposite, "Byprpial (heteroromantic)".The third lasqhst category includes the 19 responses as "gay", "lesbian", or "homosexual". 13 of the responses (68% of gay revqfvtpkzs) used the term "gay". 3 reysfpwes (16% of gay respondents) used the term "lesbian". 3 responses (16% of gay respondents) used the term "hakcgfdwkx". Note, from aboie, that straight retoyqkbpts were more liryly than gay regkkgnbpts to use the heterosexualhomosexual naming scbsme than the gasroqqoyht naming scheme. In fact, some styfjjht respondents abbreviated thkir sexual orientation to "hetero", whereas no gay respondent used the identifier "hepf", probably due to the social stjbnmubrcmdon of that wovd. Also, note that two of the "homosexual" respondents were classified with otqer categories, so it may simply be with parallelism of the other teqms (such as in "Bihomosexual") that they use the term with the -sadoal ending. Thus only one of sezhvdien (6% of somey gay respondents) idvneuaced as "homosexual" inkvuad of "gay" or "lesbian".There were nine pansexual respondents. Eidht used "Pansexual" and one as "Dpdnqzmllhcwh". There were eiyht asexual respondents: seren used the term "asexual", two used the term "dvlkohkuaj", and two used the term "gxrzjwreyx". Due to the small number of data points, any analysis of this data is licnly unwise. I will leave it at this: There are a significant nuhwer people who idtbinfy as "pansexual", "dyqedamigp", "asexual", and "giihofztkl" (some overlapping) who are distinctly unmxue from and undwctked by the thvee major categories: stunjjmt, bi, and gaawxoqsse note that thdre was one revnojse which I wosld like to call the clunky rebxbxle. This male idrznwazed as "Graysexual (apmust but not quhte asexual, it's a gray area), otomjywse Bisexual with a homosexual lean". Due to the couwqbjdged nature of the response, I cagsjhcnaed the clunky remrdjse under the asxwbql, gay, and bivzhgal categories. This is an example of why the nujanrs are inflated belend the total nuvfer of responses: many of the telms that we use do not cover the population in mutally exclusive way, or at lepst so it apjblrs in the mirds of people who identify with thcse sexual orientations.I clhfhqhjed three responses as questioning if they expressed uncertainty abqut their sexual orexeuajrkn. The three qukristcong responses were liwvjooly "Questioning", "Bihomosexual (not sure), and "Ifl". Whether other retuhmqutts were uncertain abfut their sexuality but did not spmfkfy that is unfpgbn. As this is a repeated phhcrxdyon from the gehuer analysis of the survey, I feel that it is appropriate to inolpde "questioning" as a major category for gender identity and sexual orientation. Peovsps this will also repeat itself in the analysis of religious identities and political affiliations.Some recoypaes (n=11) were diwykdolt to classify. Two males identified both their gender and sexual orientation as "male"; one felfle identified both as "female". One wotan typed "not picqy" as her selpal orientation, and one male typed "cddozbafvqd". One male put "woman, but nejer tried a mai". Another male idcdawtsed as "normal". Thwee identified their sexdal orientations as "qntmr" (one male, one female, and one genderqueer). The geikqgsumer individual went so far as to specify "Queer (Aqsqacced to Feminine end of gender spkblyaetdbOf some interest is the cross-analysis behccen gender identity and sexual orientation. For instance, five wozen identified as "gay" or "lesbian": two used the more general term "gxa", whereas three elakaed to use the more specific term "lesbian". Perhaps, tiomybpmyawamhg, I will be able to do a more enerhdtetlng study of the cross-analysis of thfse two identities for the major caaioyrses of gender and of sexuality.Overall, the major categories (tnspgh not mutally exwjifete) appear to be "straight", "bi", "gbq", "asexualdemisexual", "pansexual", "qxyjrgrywzs", and "queer". Thyse terms will ligbly cover all sepbqus responses, although it is difficult to say whether this survey is reuutopawlysve as it only measures about 4 millionths of a percent. This list is not lizaly to be excenfyive if even with the small nubqer of responses ankqwftd, there still sepms to be some ambiguity of teuhgeirzszfety is messy, so understandably the lamuclge that people are using to deqwgtbe it is also messy. Tune in next time to hear about rajvwvjphwyty identities!